On Fri, May 18, 2001 at 07:59:21AM -0000, Brother Tuck wrote:
> Thank's for your answer. What I mean in my previous mail, it's a wish.
> Is it possible to get Postgres compiled natively on Windows ?
> Sorry but for me cygnus is not a native stuff. Even If postgres run very
> well. I have try it ;c)
> I believe no... I'm sure that if you provid a native port without cygnus
> interface. Microsoft will be interested to put it on their system. For
> example I would like to provid the database to several customer. I have
> explain the product to 10 differents customer and showing them the benefit
> to use postgreSql. Only one agree with me, all other are against because
> PostgreSql is not a native port.
I purposely avoided your native Win32 port question before because I
am not qualified to answer it. FWIW, I will pass along some hearsay.
IIRC, it have been stated before that the PostgreSQL team has no plans
for a native Win32 port.
Director, Software Engineering Phone: +1 (732) 264-8770 x235
Dot Hill Systems Corp. Fax: +1 (732) 264-8798
82 Bethany Road, Suite 7 Email: Jason(dot)Tishler(at)dothill(dot)com
Hazlet, NJ 07730 USA WWW: http://www.dothill.com
pgsql-ports by date
|Next:||From: Jason Tishler||Date: 2001-05-18 14:27:48|
|Subject: Re: initdb problem|
|Previous:||From: Gerd König||Date: 2001-05-18 12:26:14|
|Subject: initdb problem|