Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Re: GIST question

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Re: GIST question
Date: 2001-05-15 21:50:44
Message-ID: (view raw or whole thread)
Lists: pgsql-patches
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Do you have any idea why you used the column in the GIST code?
> Its use in GiST is ancient ... Oleg didn't add it.

OK, I propose the following patch to remove pg_index.indhaskeytype.

The value was always TRUE, so the GIST tests are removed so the code is
always run.  Regression runs fine.  

I will keep the patch for a day and apply it if no one objects.

  Bruce Momjian                        |
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to


pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2001-05-15 22:08:50
Subject: Re: Re: GIST question
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2001-05-15 19:18:10
Subject: Fix for SQLStatistics

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2015 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group