Re: GIST question

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: GIST question
Date: 2001-05-15 14:15:26
Message-ID: 200105151415.f4FEFQj02637@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches


Do you have any idea why you used the column in the GIST code? That
code never gets run because the value is never set.

> Bruce,
>
> we dont' see any problem with removing this field (haskeytype)
> but it would be **very desirable** first to run regression test
> (make installcheck) in contrib/intarray after patch applying.
>
> Regards,
>
> Oleg
> On Tue, 15 May 2001, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > This GIST question appeared on hackers today.
> >
> >
>
> Regards,
> Oleg
> _____________________________________________________________
> Oleg Bartunov, sci.researcher, hostmaster of AstroNet,
> Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University (Russia)
> Internet: oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su, http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/
> phone: +007(095)939-16-83, +007(095)939-23-83
>
>
>

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-05-15 15:04:26 Re: Re: GIST question
Previous Message Oleg Bartunov 2001-05-15 09:22:38 Re: GIST question