On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 01:08:48PM +0100, Henshall, Stuart - WCP wrote:
> I'm using 7.1 (I need plpgsql so am not using 7.1.1),
Just curious, why can't you use 7.1.1 plpgsql?
> and the
> problem appears on the serial schedule (the parrallel schedule also hangs,
> I've not had it complete the first 13 tests). I could try the serial test
> again tonight and keep a server debug (-d2 I was thinking) output.
Any more data that you can supply regarding why the (serial) regression
tests fail on Windows 98 would be greatly appreciated.
> I hadn't really commented on it as I've had it go through an NT4
> server ok (bar one random difference), and assumed it was win9x up to its
> usual high jinx.
A fair assessment. :,)
Director, Software Engineering Phone: +1 (732) 264-8770 x235
Dot Hill Systems Corp. Fax: +1 (732) 264-8798
82 Bethany Road, Suite 7 Email: Jason(dot)Tishler(at)dothill(dot)com
Hazlet, NJ 07730 USA WWW: http://www.dothill.com
In response to
pgsql-cygwin by date
|Next:||From: Fred Yankowski||Date: 2001-05-15 16:04:55|
|Subject: Re: SIGTERM does not stop backend postgres processes immediately|
|Previous:||From: Jason Tishler||Date: 2001-05-15 14:35:03|
|Subject: Re: Re: SIGTERM does not stop backend postgres processes immediately|