Re: Remove columns pg_index.haskeytype and pg_index.indisclustered

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Remove columns pg_index.haskeytype and pg_index.indisclustered
Date: 2001-05-15 04:27:43
Message-ID: 200105150427.f4F4Rhm28913@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > How does GIST set this field?
>
> I didn't say GIST *set* it, I said GIST *used* it --- and your patch
> would've changed GIST's behavior.
>
> Perhaps the field is not really necessary, but some detailed analysis
> would be required to establish that. I'm not very clear on what GIST
> is doing with it.

Nor am I. GIST folks?

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-05-15 04:42:51 Re: Re: [HACKERS] contrib
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-05-15 04:25:01 Re: Remove columns pg_index.haskeytype and pg_index.indisclustered