[ Charset US-ASCII unsupported, converting... ]
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > Why did you remove indisclustered?
> > >
> > > Useless it may be, but gratuitously breaking at least two extant clients
> > > doesn't seem like a good idea ...
> > I patched the clients also. Is that a problem?
> Please don't reflect the server side changes in clients
> directly. Even clients in beta have to be able to talk
> to existent servers. As for removing indisclustered from
> current psqlodbc, it seems to have no problem but I'm not
It isn't a problem. The new ODBC version doesn't reference the column
anymore. The value was meaningless anyway. When we finally remove it
from pg_index, it would affect old clients, but that removal may be
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
In response to
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Thomas Lockhart||Date: 2001-05-15 01:20:26|
|Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Re: microsecond log timestamps|
|Previous:||From: Hiroshi Inoue||Date: 2001-05-15 01:11:59|
|Subject: Re: Removal of pg_variable, pg_inheritproc, pg_ipl|