Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Removal of pg_variable, pg_inheritproc, pg_ipl

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Removal of pg_variable, pg_inheritproc, pg_ipl
Date: 2001-05-15 01:17:00
Message-ID: 200105150117.f4F1H0w07004@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
[ Charset US-ASCII unsupported, converting... ]
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > 
> > > Why did you remove indisclustered?
> > >
> > > Useless it may be, but gratuitously breaking at least two extant clients
> > > doesn't seem like a good idea ...
> > 
> > I patched the clients also.  Is that a problem?
> > 
> 
> Please don't reflect the server side changes in clients
> directly. Even clients in beta have to be able to talk
> to existent servers. As for removing indisclustered from
> current psqlodbc, it seems to have no problem but I'm not
> sure.

It isn't a problem.  The new ODBC version doesn't reference the column
anymore.  The value was meaningless anyway.  When we finally remove it
from pg_index, it would affect old clients, but that removal may be
years away.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Thomas LockhartDate: 2001-05-15 01:20:26
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Re: microsecond log timestamps
Previous:From: Hiroshi InoueDate: 2001-05-15 01:11:59
Subject: Re: Removal of pg_variable, pg_inheritproc, pg_ipl

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group