| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-documentation <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Default shared memory SGML mention |
| Date: | 2001-05-08 21:11:04 |
| Message-ID: | 200105082111.f48LB5E03982@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Yes, but shared memory limits are based on buffers, not connections,
> > right? The per-connection overhead is pretty small, no?
>
> I gave you my experimentally-derived formula already:
>
> 250Kb + 8350 * B + 14580 * N
>
> I don't see how you can consider the N term negligible.
OK, patch applied.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| unknown_filename | text/plain | 832 bytes |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2001-05-09 01:44:16 | RE: VACUUM not mentioned in administrator's guide!? |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-05-08 20:54:23 | Re: Default shared memory SGML mention |