| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Lincoln Yeoh <lyeoh(at)pop(dot)jaring(dot)my> |
| Cc: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Re: The new, the improved ... FTS Searching of Mailing List Archives |
| Date: | 2001-04-28 01:45:24 |
| Message-ID: | 200104280145.f3S1jOv26009@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> <featurerequest>
> Well if stuff like that ends up in Postgresql would it be possible to index
> LIKE '%xxx%' searches? That way all people have to do is create the
> relevant index and use a fts_ops or something, and voila LIKE '%xxx%'
> searches become faster, with maybe some performance+disk space hit for
> inserts.
>
> Would something like that be difficult to implement? I'm not sure how
> function+fts index would work either.
>
> I hope FTS for postgresql doesn't start looking like Oracle's
> Context/Intermedia... Proprietary interfaces == "lock in" == "ick".
> </featurerequest>
This is what I was hoping... Something to make it automatic.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2001-04-28 01:49:09 | Re: Any optimizations to the join code in 7.1? |
| Previous Message | Lincoln Yeoh | 2001-04-28 01:29:35 | Re: The new, the improved ... FTS Searching of Mailing List Archives |