Re: [PORTS] Re: patch for minor Win32 makefile bug

Tom,

On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 03:01:17PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Right, given that the other two need not be mentioned. What about
> -L/usr/local/lib, did that make any sense to include or not?

Hmm...I guess that my emails are too long so that you lose interest while
reading them... :,)

Anyway, see the following:

On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 10:38:51PM -0400, Jason Tishler wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 06:03:45PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > BTW, I see that the prior version of backend/Makefile actually defined
> > DLLLIBS as
> >
> > DLLLIBS := -L/usr/local/lib -lcygipc -lcrypt -lcygwin -lkernel32
> >
> > as compared to what Makefile.win offers (shorn of the backend):
> >
> > DLLLIBS=-lcygipc -lcygwin -lcrypt -lkernel32
> >
> > Any comments on whether -L/usr/local/lib is appropriate here or not?
>
> We have already determined that the -L/usr/local/lib option is
> superfluous for both the Cygwin Net and b20.1 releases. See the
> following for details:
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/mhonarc/pgsql-ports/2001-03/msg00049.html

> > How does this proposal sound?
>
> Works for me. Given that we'd like to package RC3 tonight, it'd be nice
> to get this done ASAP. Do you have time to work up and test a patch
> today, or shall I risk making untested changes myself?

I'm doing a build right now. The patch should follow shortly.

Jason

--
Jason Tishler
Director, Software Engineering Phone: +1 (732) 264-8770 x235
Dot Hill Systems Corp. Fax: +1 (732) 264-8798
82 Bethany Road, Suite 7 Email: Jason(dot)Tishler(at)dothill(dot)com
Hazlet, NJ 07730 USA WWW: http://www.dothill.com