On the documentation problems, patches are gratefully accepted. As you
learn more and see problems with the docs, we'd love to get patches.
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler/
Phone: +1 972 414 9812 E-Mail: ler(at)lerctr(dot)org
US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749 US
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
On 3/29/01, 11:07:17 AM, Soma Interesting <dfunct(at)telus(dot)net> wrote
regarding Re: [GENERAL] timestamp/function question :
> At 10:56 AM 3/29/2001 -0500, you wrote:
> >Because you asked for a value based on the current *date*.
> >If you waited till tomorrow and tried again, then you'd get a
> >different answer. Perhaps you want
> > RETURN date_part(''epoch'', CURRENT_TIMESTAMP);
> Thank you Tom!
> Thank-you! Thank-you! Thank-you! Thank-you!
> How can I possibly thank you enough?! I want you to know how much I
> appreciate your answers because I'll have more questions for you one
> I love postgres, but I hate your documentation... (that doesn't mean I
> don't read it however).
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
> (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org)
In response to
pgsql-general by date
|Next:||From: Soma Interesting||Date: 2001-03-29 17:44:20|
|Subject: Re: timestamp/function question|
|Previous:||From: Mitch Vincent||Date: 2001-03-29 17:25:06|
|Subject: Re: tables, where|