Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] pgmonitor and Solaris

From: Alfred Perlstein <bright(at)wintelcom(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org>, Mathijs Brands <mathijs(at)ilse(dot)nl>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-ports <pgsql-ports(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-Admin <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] pgmonitor and Solaris
Date: 2001-03-29 00:10:52
Message-ID: 20010328161052.A9431@fw.wintelcom.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-adminpgsql-hackerspgsql-ports
* Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> [010328 16:07] wrote:
> Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org> writes:
> > FYI, the WU-FTPD code (2.6.0 or better) has a couple of more platforms 
> > including UnixWare.  The UnixWare code will need /dev/kmem permission to 
> > change it's stuff, so I don't know whether we want to do this or not, but 
> > if people are looking at the ps stuff, please look at this as well.
> 
> Well, *I* sure wouldn't run Postgres with write permission on /dev/kmem.
> Especially not just to make ps_status work...

Wow... is this all for "pgmonitor"?

sorry, just my opinion...

If it for pgmonitor then you guys ought to just mark it broken on
these platforms, the non-"ps based" solution could have been
implemented with all the time wasted trying to get the "ps based"
hack working. :(

-- 
-Alfred Perlstein - [bright(at)wintelcom(dot)net|alfred(at)freebsd(dot)org]
Daemon News Magazine in your snail-mail! http://magazine.daemonnews.org/

In response to

Responses

pgsql-ports by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2001-03-29 00:12:39
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] pgmonitor and Solaris
Previous:From: Mathijs BrandsDate: 2001-03-29 00:07:39
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] pgmonitor and Solaris

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2001-03-29 00:12:39
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] pgmonitor and Solaris
Previous:From: Mathijs BrandsDate: 2001-03-29 00:07:39
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] pgmonitor and Solaris

pgsql-admin by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2001-03-29 00:12:39
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] pgmonitor and Solaris
Previous:From: Mathijs BrandsDate: 2001-03-29 00:07:39
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] pgmonitor and Solaris

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group