| From: | Stephen Davies <scldad(at)sdc(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Stephen Davies <scldad(at)sdc(dot)com(dot)au>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: records zapped to null |
| Date: | 2001-03-27 05:32:57 |
| Message-ID: | 200103270532.PAA29638@mustang.sdc.com.au |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Yes, that is what I mean: every column in the affected rows had been
changed to null;
The description is:
Table "request"
Attribute | Type | Modifier
-------------+----------+----------------------------------------
id | integer | default nextval('reqid'::text)
agency_id | integer |
opportunity | text |
start_date | date |
end_date | date |
focus | text |
slots | smallint |
filled | smallint |
referred | smallint |
date_recd | date | default date("timestamp"('now'::text))
task | text |
uflg | boolean | default 'f'
Indices: redtx,
reqkey,
rfocx,
rmemx,
rsdtx,
tskx
On Tue, 27 Mar 2001 00:09:46 -0500, Tom Lane said:
> Stephen Davies <scldad(at)sdc(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> > I have just had to restore a database from backup because the majority
> > of records in one table had "magically" become null.
>
> There's no such thing as a null record in Postgres. What do you mean
> exactly: were the records still present but their fields all read as
> nulls?
>
> What is the declaration of the table?
>
> regards, tom lane
========================================================================
Stephen Davies Consulting scldad(at)sdc(dot)com(dot)au
Adelaide, South Australia. Voice: 08-8177 1595
Computing & Network solutions. Fax: 08-8177 0133
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | will trillich | 2001-03-27 06:15:17 | Re: Determine Time in other Time Zone |
| Previous Message | Ian Lance Taylor | 2001-03-27 05:18:43 | Re: MIPS test-and-set |