Re: odbc/UnixWare 7.1.1: No Go.

From: Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org>
To:
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Hackers List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: odbc/UnixWare 7.1.1: No Go.
Date: 2001-03-24 16:28:24
Message-ID: 20010324102824.A17133@lerami.lerctr.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-odbc

I'll take the deafening silence as a NO?

LER

* Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org> [010323 16:59]:
> Can I get a go/nogo decision on whether these two functions can be #if'd
> out for 7.1?
>
> Thanks.
>
> LER
>
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
>
> On 3/22/01, 4:02:45 PM, Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org> wrote regarding Re:
> [HACKERS] odbc/UnixWare 7.1.1: No Go. :
>
>
> > OK, it *IS* just a WARNING that the symbols are undefined.
>
> > SO, can we get the _fini/_init stuff commented/taken out for 7.1?
>
> > LER
>
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
>
> > On 3/22/01, 3:38:59 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote regarding Re:
> > [HACKERS] odbc/UnixWare 7.1.1: No Go. :
>
>
> > > Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org> writes:
> > > > My question is WHY are we using -Bsymbolic and/or -z text anyway?
> > > > These options don't appear to buy us anything but grief on SVR[45] ELF
> > > > systems..
>
> > > I have no idea what -z text means to your linker, but if it has a
> > > -Bsymbolic option then it's a good bet that you need that. The ODBC
> > > driver contains some function names that duplicate names in the unixODBC
> > > driver manager. The driver's own references to these functions *must*
> > > be resolved to its own routines and not the manager's, else havoc
> > > ensues. But for some reason, the other way is the default on many
> > > platforms.
>
> > > Do not assume that you have this right just because the build succeeds.
> > > I found in testing on HPUX that not only could you build a wrongly
> > > linked driver, but it would actually load and connect. Only certain
> > > kinds of queries exhibited the problem. In short: better test it before
> > > you claim you have it fixed.
>
> > > regards, tom lane
>
> > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> > TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: ler(at)lerctr(dot)org
US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-03-24 16:32:02 Re: [HACKERS] Re: 7.1 docs
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-03-24 16:18:57 Re: Re: Call for platforms

Browse pgsql-odbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-03-24 16:49:26 Re: odbc/UnixWare 7.1.1: No Go.
Previous Message Hiroshi Inoue 2001-03-24 02:31:51 RE: pgsqODBC binding parameters II (fwd)