Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: PAM support? (was: Authentication against /etc/passwd?)

From: "Anthony E (dot) Greene" <agreene(at)pobox(dot)com>
To: pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PAM support? (was: Authentication against /etc/passwd?)
Date: 2001-03-22 00:37:53
Message-ID: 20010321193753.E28437@cp5340 (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-novice
On Wed, 21 Mar 2001 10:38:28 Adrian(dot)Jackson(at)ioshq(dot)com wrote:
>Is there any way to authenticate users against the /etc/passwd (or
>/etc/shadow) file rather than the pg_shadow table? Is there any good 
>reason for *not* wanting to do this (other than the general badness of
>sending passwords in plain text across the network, that is...)?

PAM support might be a better option. I looked around the 'Net and around
the Web site and could not find any information indicating whether or not
someone is working on this.

Tony
-- 
Anthony E. Greene <agreene(at)pobox(dot)com> <http://www.pobox.com/~agreene/>
PGP Key: 0x6C94239D/7B3D BD7D 7D91 1B44 BA26  C484 A42A 60DD 6C94 239D
Chat:  AOL/Yahoo: TonyG05    ICQ: 91183266
Linux. The choice of a GNU Generation. <http://www.linux.org/>

In response to

pgsql-novice by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2001-03-22 06:04:08
Subject: Re: Authentication against /etc/passwd?
Previous:From: Lars ForsethDate: 2001-03-21 21:23:34
Subject: RE: Postgres - trouble starting it - solved and SUM of what I did

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group