> Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA(at)Wien(dot)Spardat(dot)at> writes:
> >> At least one of my concerns (single point of failure) would require a
> >> change to the layout of pg_control, which would force initdb anyway.
> > Was that the "only one checkpoint back in time in pg_control" issue ?
Is changing pg_control the thing that is going to require the initdb?
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2001-03-05 16:26:38|
|Subject: Re: Query Planning time increased 3 times on 7.1 compared to 7.0.3 |
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2001-03-05 16:13:52|
|Subject: Re: AW: WAL & RC1 status |