Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Uh, this is *not* a 64-bit CRC ...

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Uh, this is *not* a 64-bit CRC ...
Date: 2001-03-01 03:30:19
Message-ID: 200103010330.WAA00180@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> > Added to TODO:
> > 
> > 	* Correct CRC WAL code to be normal CRC32 algorithm 
> 
> Um, how about
> 
>       * Correct CRC WAL code to be a real CRC64 algorithm
> 
> instead?

Done.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tatsuo IshiiDate: 2001-03-01 05:05:57
Subject: Re: SunOS4
Previous:From: Nathan MyersDate: 2001-03-01 02:51:18
Subject: Re: Uh, this is *not* a 64-bit CRC ...

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group