Re: vacuum analyze fails: ERROR: Unable to locate type oid 2230924 in catalog

From: Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: vacuum analyze fails: ERROR: Unable to locate type oid 2230924 in catalog
Date: 2001-02-27 04:43:24
Message-ID: 20010227134324V.t-ishii@sra.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
> > I thought "typeidIsValid(targetTypeId) == false" is better than
> > "!typeidIsValid(targetTypeId)"?
>
> I've always thought that "== true" and "== false" on something that's
> already a boolean are not good style. It's a matter of taste I suppose.
> But note that the existing calls on typeidIsValid are coded that way...
>
> regards, tom lane

I see.
--
Tatsuo Ishii

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-02-27 04:45:18 Re: Re[2]: Re: [PATCHES] A patch for xlog.c
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-02-27 04:39:24 Re: vacuum analyze fails: ERROR: Unable to locate type oid 2230924 in catalog