Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: CommitDelay performance improvement

From: Dominique Quatravaux <dom(at)idealx(dot)com>
To: Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: CommitDelay performance improvement
Date: 2001-02-25 16:27:06
Message-ID: 20010225172706.A26677@singer.ird.idealx.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> >Basically, I am not sure how much we lose by doing the delay after
> >returning COMMIT, and I know we gain quite a bit by enabling us to group
> >fsync calls.
> 
> If included, this should be an option only, and not the default option. 

  Sure it should never become the default, because the "D" in ACID is just
about forbidding this kind of behaviour...

-- 
  Dominique

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: J.H.M. Dassen RayDate: 2001-02-25 16:29:35
Subject: Re: ask for help !!! (emergency case)
Previous:From: Hiroshi InoueDate: 2001-02-25 14:25:15
Subject: RE: CommitDelay performance improvement

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group