Re: Re: RE: [PATCHES] Re: [HACKERS] 6.2 protocol

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: "'pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: RE: [PATCHES] Re: [HACKERS] 6.2 protocol
Date: 2001-02-14 14:57:16
Message-ID: 200102141457.JAA00536@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-odbc

> > > Where would one get the source for this "unsupported"
> > driver? (..not that
> > > I care). Being open source software, I'd hate to see
> > something binary
> > > only..
> > >
> >
> > Compatibility is back in the ODBC driver source code.
> >
>
> Not that I'm questioning your wisdom Bruce :-) but I got the impression that
> most people who commented on this issue thought that removal of the code was
> the better option to keep things tidy. Did I miss something?

Yes, most agreed, but because we are in beta, and because there is no
official ODBC maintainer to make the decision, we will leave it in for
7.1. I can remove it during 7.2 development cycle if people still agree
it should be removed.

[ Actually, it was not my wisdom. I was overruled. ]

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-odbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hiroshi Inoue 2001-02-15 07:09:35 ODBC changes
Previous Message Cedar Cox 2001-02-14 10:48:29 RE: Re: RE: [PATCHES] Re: [HACKERS] 6.2 protocol