Re: RE: [PATCHES] Re: [HACKERS] 6.2 protocol

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>, Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL odbc list <pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: RE: [PATCHES] Re: [HACKERS] 6.2 protocol
Date: 2001-02-12 02:02:57
Message-ID: 200102120202.VAA15241@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-odbc

> > Removal seemed to obvious to discuss, I guess, and when I got on OK, I
> > was on my way.
>
> Since you obvious had to have had some sort of discussion and approval
> (especially after all that you and I have discussed) for the original
> patch, a similar discussion and approval should have been attained for
> removing it ... someone had to have liked the original patch to have given
> you the go-ahead on it, right?

I am confused. The Hiroshi point was the <=6.3 compatibility code
removal. That was never submitted as a patch. If you are referring to
that one, it was added back in the 6.4 days, I guess, but obviously has
little use now that we are on 7.1.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-odbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Adam Lang 2001-02-12 14:31:08 Re: RE: [PATCHES] Re: [HACKERS] 6.2 protocol
Previous Message The Hermit Hacker 2001-02-12 01:57:44 Re: RE: [PATCHES] Re: [HACKERS] 6.2 protocol