Re: New setval() call

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: New setval() call
Date: 2001-02-10 23:34:20
Message-ID: 200102102334.SAA20214@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> At 12:23 10/02/01 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >I am inclinded to remove this open item:
> >
> > New SQL function setval(seq,val,bool) for use in pg_dump (Philip)
> >
> >The use of the 3rd parameter, 'iscalled', while used by pg_dump, is not
> >of general use, so we probably don't need to document it. Is this valid?
> >
> >Info on the new param is:
>
> Fine with me; I think your recollection is correct - but it would be worth
> putting a description *somewhere*. Do we have an internals doc of any kind?
> Something that describes interfaces etc that are not guaranteed to remain
> static or supported?

Can you give me a few lines to put in sequence.c? There isn't even
anything in there!

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-02-10 23:35:50 Re: [ODBC] RE: [PATCHES] Fix for ODBC close
Previous Message Philip Warner 2001-02-10 23:32:00 Re: New setval() call