| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Fix for large objects |
| Date: | 2001-02-09 22:26:35 |
| Message-ID: | 200102092226.RAA24420@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
I have applied the following patch to remove the assumption that
xinv/xinx files are large objects. They are now all stored in
pg_largeobject, so there is no query anymore that dumps out a list of
them. Do we need to find another way to handle a large object listing
from jdbc?
Also, should we remove jbdc/postgresql now that we have org/postgresql
working?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| unknown_filename | text/plain | 8.6 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-02-09 23:30:07 | 6.2 protocol |
| Previous Message | Vadim Mikheev | 2001-02-09 20:48:46 | Re: Btree runtime recovery. Stuck spins. |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-02-09 23:30:07 | 6.2 protocol |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-02-09 19:25:58 | Re: Re: [HACKERS] Open 7.1 items |