Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Fix for large objects

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Fix for large objects
Date: 2001-02-09 22:26:35
Message-ID: 200102092226.RAA24420@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
I have applied the following patch to remove the assumption that
xinv/xinx files are large objects.  They are now all stored in
pg_largeobject, so there is no query anymore that dumps out a list of
them.  Do we need to find another way to handle a large object listing
from jdbc?

Also, should we remove jbdc/postgresql now that we have org/postgresql
working?

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2001-02-09 23:30:07
Subject: 6.2 protocol
Previous:From: Vadim MikheevDate: 2001-02-09 20:48:46
Subject: Re: Btree runtime recovery. Stuck spins.

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2001-02-09 23:30:07
Subject: 6.2 protocol
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2001-02-09 19:25:58
Subject: Re: Re: [HACKERS] Open 7.1 items

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group