Here is a context diff of the current CVS and the user-supplied version
> On Fri, 2 Feb 2001, Peter T Mount wrote:
> > > What is the final resolution of this for 7.1? I noticed that you have
> > > essentially commented out the byte array pooling code in current
> > > sources. Given that 7.1 is rapidly coming to a close, is this
> > > something
> > > that is expected to get fixed and reenabled for 7.1, or is this going
> > > to wait for 7.2.
> > I commented it out to make sure that when 7.1 was released the driver
> > would at least work (with it enabled we would have one broken driver).
> At Microstate, we fixed the byte pooling code when it was still in
> PG_Stream. We patched this and submitted our patch to pgsql-patches, and
> it was accepted. It did have some nasty off-by-one errors. It does not
> look like the fixes we did made it into the new, separate
> org.postgresql.core.BytePoolDim classes.
> We've been using this code on an application with many tens of thousands
> of queries per day for more than a month without any problems.
> I've attached the production PG_Stream.java class that we've been using.
> Richard Bullington-McGuire <rbulling(at)microstate(dot)com>
> Chief Technology Officer, The Microstate Corporation
> Phone: 703-796-6446 URL: http://www.microstate.com/
> PGP key IDs: RSA: 0x93862305 DH/DSS: 0xDAC3028E
[ Attachment, skipping... ]
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
In response to
pgsql-jdbc by date
|Next:||From: Peter Mount||Date: 2001-02-03 11:20:57|
|Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [PATCHES] Re: Fixes and enhancements to
JDBC driver(take 2)|
|Previous:||From: Srikanth Rao||Date: 2001-02-02 16:41:19|
|Subject: Help storing jpeg files|