Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: AW: Shouldn't this be an error?

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA(at)wien(dot)spardat(dot)at>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: AW: Shouldn't this be an error?
Date: 2001-01-29 17:44:37
Message-ID: 200101291744.MAA20512@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> missing SQL features hereabouts also, such as being able to write
> a DEFAULTed column explicitly:
> 	INSERT ... VALUES('foo', DEFAULT, 42);
> and being able to insert multiple explicit rows:
> 	INSERT ... VALUES('foo', DEFAULT, 42), VALUES('bar', 99, 44);
> I think we should deal with all of these issues at once, which means
> it's not something to try to fix for 7.1.  Bruce, would you add a
> TODO item?
> 
>   * Bring INSERT ... VALUES up to full SQL92 spec.

Added to TODO:

  * Bring INSERT ... VALUES up to full SQL92 spec, disallow missing columns

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2001-01-29 17:45:24
Subject: Re: AW: Shouldn't this be an error?
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2001-01-29 17:42:28
Subject: Re: BLOB HOWTO??

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group