| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: postgres limitation |
| Date: | 2001-01-28 15:44:19 |
| Message-ID: | 200101281544.KAA01275@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-docs |
> > > Maximum size for a table?
> > >
> > > 2G blocks, hence 16 to 64 terabytes depending on the BLCKSZ
> > > configuration constant. (If someone were to run around and make sure
> > > all the block-number arithmetic is unsigned, we could claim 4G blocks,
> > > but I think it's not all unsigned now...)
Added to TODO:
* Make sure all block numbers are unsigned to increase maximum table size
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-01-28 17:41:28 | Re: postgres limitation |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-01-28 15:19:21 | Re: postgres limitation |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-01-28 17:41:28 | Re: postgres limitation |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-01-28 15:19:21 | Re: postgres limitation |