Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Re: SourceForge & Postgres (fwd)

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tim Perdue <tim(at)sourceforge(dot)net>
Cc: Jeff Duffy <jduffy(at)greatbridge(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Re: SourceForge & Postgres (fwd)
Date: 2001-01-27 04:23:55
Message-ID: 200101270423.XAA01547@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> Do we need to do a bunch of testing on Beta3 before deployment or is it
> so much more stable that it absolutely will have no problems?
> 
> We haven't had any problems with the ~Nov 17 snapshot, so we figure why mess
> with a good thing.

Well, seeing as we never tested the Nov 17 snapshot, and we have
seriously tested beta3, I think you are certainly better off upgrading.

We don't normally have people running snapshots.  This is not because
they are unstable, but because we don't trust them.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2001-01-27 04:28:01
Subject: Re: PQprint
Previous:From: Sasha PachevDate: 2001-01-27 03:21:20
Subject: Re: Which version?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group