Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: This script will crash the connection

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Jan Wieck <janwieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, Steve Howe <howe(at)carcass(dot)dhs(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: This script will crash the connection
Date: 2001-01-26 20:35:22
Message-ID: 200101262035.PAA03869@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> >     Would be something for a STATEMENT trigger. We don't have 'em
> >     yet and I'm not sure  what  kind  of  information  they  will
> >     receive  if we finally implement them. But the number of rows
> >     affected by the statement is a good candidate.
> 
> That's no help for a 7.1 solution however.  We can't start inventing
> a new feature at this stage.
> 
> What I am inclined to do is have the rewriter reject conditional rules
> that contain NOTIFY.  That seems like the minimal restriction that will
> prevent a crash or incorrect behavior.  Comments?

OK, added to TODO:

	* Allow NOTIFY in rules

and removed from open items list.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Alfred PerlsteinDate: 2001-01-26 20:49:30
Subject: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone
Previous:From: Ross J. ReedstromDate: 2001-01-26 20:24:34
Subject: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group