Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Re: [GENERAL] Re: JDBC Performance

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: "Gunnar R|nning" <gunnar(at)candleweb(dot)no>, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org, Peter Mount <peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk>
Subject: Re: Re: [GENERAL] Re: JDBC Performance
Date: 2001-01-25 00:06:47
Message-ID: 200101250006.TAA19652@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-generalpgsql-jdbc
> On 18 Oct 2000, Gunnar R|nning wrote:
> 
> > Peter Mount <peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk> writes:
> >
> >
> > > > couldn't produce a full patch using cvs diff -c this time since I have
> > > > created new files and anonymous cvs usage doesn't allow you to
> > > > adds. I'm supplying the modified src/interfaces/jdbc as a tarball at :
> > > > http://www.candleweb.no/~gunnar/projects/pgsql/postgres-jdbc-2000-10-05.tgz
> > >
> > > Got it. Don't worry about the diff, I'll merge it in manually. At this
> > > stage, it will be easier, and less prone to generating bugs with the
> > > changes I've got here.
> >
> > Hmm. I just grabbed the latest source from CVS and it seems to be that my
> > first version and not the latest one who is merged in(or maybe it was Bruce
> > who did that...). Anyway the version in CVS is buggy and should be replaced
> > with the version from October 5 pointed to in the mail quoted above.  The
> > current changes in CVS needs to be backed out one way or the other.
> 
> has to be backed out one way or another ... because ... ?

This was an old email I posted to find out what was happening, and
forgot to add a comment at the top.


-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

pgsql-jdbc by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2001-01-25 00:07:26
Subject: Re: Re: [GENERAL] Re: JDBC Performance
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2001-01-25 00:04:03
Subject: Re: no way in LargeObject API to detect short read?

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2001-01-25 00:07:26
Subject: Re: Re: [GENERAL] Re: JDBC Performance
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2001-01-24 23:42:45
Subject: Re: beta3 Solaris 7 (SPARC) port report [ Was: Looking for . . . ]

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group