Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [PATCHES] Re: [INTERFACES] Patch for JDBC timestamp problems

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Joseph Shraibman <jks(at)selectacast(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL jdbc list <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Re: [INTERFACES] Patch for JDBC timestamp problems
Date: 2001-01-24 23:01:38
Message-ID: 200101242301.SAA09396@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-interfacespgsql-jdbcpgsql-patches
OK, so you are saying I should apply the patch that removes the the
static.  I will do it now. Thanks.  That clears up a few open emails
for me.


> Joseph Shraibman wrote:
> > 
> > No, it cannot be static.
> > 
> 
> Well actually there could be static variables, but they could not be
> used directly.  It might pay just to keep them around to clone() so we
> don't have to reconstruct them for every method that uses them.  But the
> performance gain would be minimal and would add a bit of confusion to
> the code, so I don't suggest it.
> 
> 
> -- 
> Joseph Shraibman
> jks(at)selectacast(dot)net
> Increase signal to noise ratio.  http://www.targabot.com
> 


-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2001-01-24 23:41:27
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Revised Patch for JDBC timestamp problems
Previous:From: Dave PageDate: 2001-01-24 22:35:48
Subject: Additional ODBC patch

pgsql-interfaces by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2001-01-24 23:41:27
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Revised Patch for JDBC timestamp problems
Previous:From: Joseph ShraibmanDate: 2001-01-24 22:25:44
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Re: [INTERFACES] Patch for JDBC timestamp problems

pgsql-jdbc by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2001-01-24 23:41:27
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Revised Patch for JDBC timestamp problems
Previous:From: Joseph ShraibmanDate: 2001-01-24 22:25:44
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Re: [INTERFACES] Patch for JDBC timestamp problems

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group