Re: pg_shadow.usecatupd attribute

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_shadow.usecatupd attribute
Date: 2001-01-23 20:28:42
Message-ID: 200101232028.PAA00627@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


Yes, I vote for removal.

> While I'm at it and before I forget the 76 places one needs to edit to
> add/remove a system catalog column, what are people's feelings about the
> usecatupd column?
>
> The use of this field is that, if false, it disallows any direct
> modification of system catalogs, even for superusers. In the past there
> were several opinions that this field was useless/confusing/stupid/not
> worthwhile.
>
> I'm also going to remove the usetrace column, since that's not used.
>
> (post-7.1 material, btw.)
>
> --
> Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://yi.org/peter-e/
>
>

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2001-01-23 20:44:30 Re: "initdb -t" destroys all databases
Previous Message Patrick Welche 2001-01-23 20:25:30 Re: AW: like and optimization