On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 11:55:56PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 27, 2000 at 12:56:26AM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > I have been asked by the major PHP developer Rasmus Lerdorf to see if
> > > the PostgreSQL/PHP interface needs any improvements.
> > >
> > > Is the current PostgreSQL interface module in PHP adequate? Does it
> > > support all the current libpq features?
> > >
> > > If not, would someone submit some patches to the PHP folks. They want
> > > us to work well with PHP. They are basically encouraging us to improve
> > > it in any way we can.
> > I use PHP and Postgres together quite a bit, and find the APIs
> > complete enough for most things. However, just last week I implemented
> > pg_lolseek($loid, $offset $whence)
> > and
> > pg_lotell($loid)
> > For some stuff that we are working on. They are pretty straightforward,
> > and I can package them up and submit them if someone wants.
> Would to send this over to the PHP folks for inclusion? Thanks.
I sent them patches against the at-the-time up-to-date CVS tree back
when this first came up, they said that they failed, so I sent them another
set, and have not heard back from them. It doesn't seem to show up in the
I'll bug someone again and see if I can find out what happened. I mean,
they only have 240 people with write access to the cvs tree...
Adam Haberlach |A cat spends her life conflicted between a
adam(at)newsnipple(dot)com |deep, passionate, and profound desire for
http://www.newsnipple.com |fish and an equally deep, passionate, and
'88 EX500 |profound desire to avoid getting wet.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Mikheev, Vadim||Date: 2001-01-23 18:23:22|
|Subject: RE: Does Oracle store values in indices?|
|Previous:||From: Thomas Lockhart||Date: 2001-01-23 18:08:17|
|Subject: Re: [GENERAL] MySQL -> Postgres dump converter|
pgsql-interfaces by date
|Next:||From: David Wall||Date: 2001-01-23 18:56:32|
|Subject: blobs and small binary objects|
|Previous:||From: Max Khon||Date: 2001-01-23 18:05:47|
|Subject: Re: Re: more odbc patches|