Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Cygwin PostgreSQL Regression Test Problems

From: Jason Tishler <Jason(dot)Tishler(at)dothill(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-ports(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Cygwin PostgreSQL Regression Test Problems
Date: 2001-01-18 20:01:18
Message-ID: 20010118150118.N1092@dothill.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-ports
Tom,

On Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 01:53:36PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Jason Tishler <Jason(dot)Tishler(at)dothill(dot)com> writes:
> > With the above caveats, is the current functionality sufficient for
> > PostgreSQL's needs?
> 
> The fixed-size-array thing sounds like a gotcha waiting to bite someone.

Agreed.

> How big is the array, anyway?

The current size is 100 deep.  Is that sufficient for PostgreSQL or is
this dependent on usage?

Jason

-- 
Jason Tishler
Director, Software Engineering       Phone: +1 (732) 264-8770 x235
Dot Hill Systems Corp.               Fax:   +1 (732) 264-8798
82 Bethany Road, Suite 7             Email: Jason(dot)Tishler(at)dothill(dot)com
Hazlet, NJ 07730 USA                 WWW:   http://www.dothill.com

In response to

Responses

pgsql-ports by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2001-01-18 20:53:44
Subject: Re: Cygwin PostgreSQL Regression Test Problems
Previous:From: Jason TishlerDate: 2001-01-18 19:55:14
Subject: Re: Cygwin PostgreSQL CVS Patch

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group