I'm finally back in front of the machine where I ran these tests...
On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 01:45:21AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Jason Tishler <Jason(dot)Tishler(at)dothill(dot)com> writes:
> > parallel group (7 tests): create_aggregate create_operator inherit triggers constraints create_misc create_index
> > constraints ... FAILED
> > triggers ... FAILED
> > create_misc ... FAILED
> > create_aggregate ... ok
> Can't tell much from this. What are the detail diffs (regression.diffs file?)
Unfortunately I ran more (successful) tests after these failure, so the
detail diffs are no longer available.
> > 2. I am unable to successfully run the regression tests on a NT 4.0 SP5
> > machine with only 64 MB of physical memory and about 175 MB of swap space.
> > Other than lacking RAM and swap space, this machine is the "same" as other
> > NT/2000 machines which can successfully run the regression tests.
> What if anything shows up in the postmaster log?
Sorry, the postmaster log is gone too.
> > 3. Once (or twice), I noticed that the plpgsql test failed.
> > Unfortunately, I didn't capture the precise output but I think that
> > postmaster was complaining about being unable to
> > mv <somepath>/pg_internal.init.<somepid> <somepath>/pg_internal.init
> > due to a permissions problem. Sorry, for being vague...
> Hm. The first backend to fire up after a vacuum will try to rebuild
> pg_internal.init, and then move it into place with
> * And rename the temp file to its final name, deleting any
> * previously-existing init file.
> if (rename(tempfilename, finalfilename) < 0)
> elog(NOTICE, "Cannot rename init file %s to %s: %m\n\tContinuing anyway, but there's something wrong.", tempfilename, finalfilename);
> In a parallel test it's possible that several backends would try to do
> this at about the same time, but that should be OK; we should end up
> with just one file from the last-to-finish backend. I think you have
> found another Cygwin bug :-(
Windows has issues with open files. So, if a backend is trying to
rename a file when it is open (by another), then the rename will fail.
Will this cause database integrity problems? Or, will there just be
some spurious warning?
Director, Software Engineering Phone: +1 (732) 264-8770 x235
Dot Hill Systems Corp. Fax: +1 (732) 264-8798
82 Bethany Road, Suite 7 Email: Jason(dot)Tishler(at)dothill(dot)com
Hazlet, NJ 07730 USA WWW: http://www.dothill.com
In response to
pgsql-ports by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2001-01-18 17:39:59|
|Subject: Re: Cygwin PostgreSQL Regression Test Problems |
|Previous:||From: Jason Tishler||Date: 2001-01-18 13:29:14|
|Subject: Re: (Cygwin) postmaster shutdown problem|