On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 09:06:10PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Jason Tishler writes:
> > Unfortunately, I have not received any more feedback regarding the
> > Cygwin patch issues. Should I submit my latest patch anyway? Did I
> > miss the 7.1beta2 release?
> I've already fixed the sys_nerr and removed -L$(libdir), as per your
> previous patch. I think that leaves you with adding DLLIMPORT at the
> appropriate places and doing something about dllinit.c. I'm not sure what
> the outcome of the discussion about the latter was, but I think using the
> API version number as a conditional was thought to be feasible.
I'm working against CVS now to provide the remainder of the Cygwin patch.
Why did you remove the following from src/include/port/win.h?
#if (CYGWIN_VERSION_API_MAJOR >= 0) && (CYGWIN_VERSION_API_MINOR >= 8)
#define sys_nerr _sys_nerr
This definitely breaks Cygwin.
I guess that the discussion continues... :,)
Director, Software Engineering Phone: +1 (732) 264-8770 x235
Dot Hill Systems Corp. Fax: +1 (732) 264-8798
82 Bethany Road, Suite 7 Email: Jason(dot)Tishler(at)dothill(dot)com
Hazlet, NJ 07730 USA WWW: http://www.dothill.com
In response to
pgsql-ports by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2001-01-09 21:34:57|
|Subject: Re: Cygwin PostgreSQL CVS Patch Question |
|Previous:||From: Peter Eisentraut||Date: 2001-01-09 20:06:10|
|Subject: Re: Re: Cygwin PostgreSQL postmaster abort problem|