> On Sat, Dec 30, 2000 at 02:34:24AM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > 
> > If libedit could be used as an alternative to readline depending on your
> > operating system setup then there's nothing wrong with that.  NetBSD
> > already went the other way around and made libedit compatible with
> > readline.
> 
> I had an attempt at fooling configure to look in libedit rather than
> readline, and all was OK except our libedit doesn't have "rl_special_prefixes"
> so tab-complete:105 is unhappy - I don't know what it is meant to do...
> 
> Re licence business, one could argue hooks are there to use NetBSD libedit ;)

Agreed.  It would be nice to have configure look for libedit or
libreadline, and use either automatically.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

• Re: GNU readline and BSD license at 2000-12-30 21:34:16 from Patrick Welche

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Bruce Momjian	Date: 2001-01-03 02:24:12
	Subject: Re: GNU readline and BSD license
Previous:	From: Alfred Perlstein	Date: 2001-01-02 23:58:19
	Subject: Re: Patches with vacuum fixes available for 7.0.x