Re: [HACKERS] Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha)

From: Brent Verner <brent(at)rcfile(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Ryan Kirkpatrick <rkirkpat(at)rkirkpat(dot)net>, pgsql-patches(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha)
Date: 2000-12-27 23:35:30
Message-ID: 20001227183530.A6638@rcfile.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

On 27 Dec 2000 at 18:10 (-0500), Tom Lane wrote:
| Brent Verner <brent(at)rcfile(dot)org> writes:
| > this patch fixes the SEGV problem in the regression tests. the only
| > remaining failures, which are not due to SEGV, are:
| > oid ... FAILED
| > float8 ... FAILED
| > geometry ... FAILED
|
| What are the regression diffs, exactly?

see attachment.

brent

Attachment Content-Type Size
regression.diffs text/plain 9.2 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tatsuo Ishii 2000-12-27 23:36:41 Re: About PQsetClientEncoding(),"SET NAMES",and "SET CLIENT_ENCODING"
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-12-27 23:10:07 Re: [HACKERS] Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha)

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tatsuo Ishii 2000-12-27 23:36:41 Re: About PQsetClientEncoding(),"SET NAMES",and "SET CLIENT_ENCODING"
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-12-27 23:10:07 Re: [HACKERS] Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha)