Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha)

From: Brent Verner <brent(at)rcfile(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Ryan Kirkpatrick <rkirkpat(at)rkirkpat(dot)net>, pgsql-patches(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha)
Date: 2000-12-27 23:35:30
Message-ID: 20001227183530.A6638@rcfile.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
On 27 Dec 2000 at 18:10 (-0500), Tom Lane wrote:
| Brent Verner <brent(at)rcfile(dot)org> writes:
| > this patch fixes the SEGV problem in the regression tests. the only 
| > remaining failures, which are not due to SEGV, are:
| >   oid                  ... FAILED
| >   float8               ... FAILED
| >   geometry             ... FAILED
| 
| What are the regression diffs, exactly?

see attachment.

  brent

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tatsuo IshiiDate: 2000-12-27 23:36:41
Subject: Re: About PQsetClientEncoding(),"SET NAMES",and "SET CLIENT_ENCODING"
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2000-12-27 23:10:07
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha)

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Tatsuo IshiiDate: 2000-12-27 23:36:41
Subject: Re: About PQsetClientEncoding(),"SET NAMES",and "SET CLIENT_ENCODING"
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2000-12-27 23:10:07
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group