From: | Brent Verner <brent(at)rcfile(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha) |
Date: | 2000-12-26 23:03:42 |
Message-ID: | 20001226180342.A32095@rcfile.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On 26 Dec 2000 at 14:41 (-0500), Tom Lane wrote:
| I wrote:
| > ... What I'm thinking about doing is setting typmod of
| > an entire-tuple function argument to sizeof(Pointer), rather than
| > the default -1, to indicate that a pointer representation is being
| > used. Comments, hackers?
|
| Here is a patch to current sources along this line. I have not
| committed it, since I'm not sure it does the job. It doesn't break
| the regress tests on my machine, but does it fix them on Alphas?
| Please apply it locally and let me know what you find.
what I'm seeing now is much the same. FWIW, it looks like we're picking
up the cruft around
functions.c:354 paramLI->value = fcinfo->arg[paramLI->id - 1];
(both of which are type Datum)
i've been in circles trying to figure out where fcinfo->arg is filled.
can you point me toward that?
thanks for your help.
brent
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-12-27 04:41:20 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha) |
Previous Message | Paul Govereau | 2000-12-26 21:52:51 | Inheritance docs error. |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-12-27 04:41:20 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha) |
Previous Message | Brent Verner | 2000-12-26 20:47:37 | Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha) |