Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha

From: Brent Verner <brent(at)rcfile(dot)org>
To: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha
Date: 2000-12-24 20:14:19
Message-ID: 20001224151419.A22135@rcfile.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
On 24 Dec 2000 at 00:47 (-0500), Tom Lane wrote:
| 
| > I'll send the patch that allows me to
| > cleanly build with gcc. right now, s_lock.h does the wrong thing
| > when compiling on Alpha/OSF with gcc.
| 
| Roger, we want to build with either.

The attached patch _seems_ to do the right thing. could someone
who knows Alpha assembly check it out (please).

for more info on Alpha assembly, this link may help.
http://tru64unix.compaq.com/faqs/publications/base_doc/DOCUMENTATION/V40D_HTML/APS31DTE/TITLE.HTM

  brent 'who learned too much today'

Attachment: gcc.s_lock.h
Description: text/x-chdr (1.8 KB)

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Rod TaylorDate: 2000-12-24 22:00:08
Subject: Thoughts regarding pg_dump
Previous:From: mlwDate: 2000-12-24 18:52:43
Subject: Upper limit on number of buffers?

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Brent VernerDate: 2000-12-26 02:01:06
Subject: Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2000-12-24 06:19:34
Subject: Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group