Re: RE: version numbers of WinODBC

Those version numbers make no sense against the PostgreSQL versions, so
we have just left them alone. Why are there multiple versions floating
around?

[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Kovacs Zoltan Sandor [mailto:tip(at)pc10(dot)radnoti-szeged(dot)sulinet(dot)hu]
> > Sent: 19 December 2000 12:53
> > To: Dave Page
> > Cc: 'Joel Burton'; Pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org
> > Subject: version numbers of WinODBC
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 19 Dec 2000, Dave Page wrote:
> >
> > > Just downloaded this driver to get the referential
> > integrity stuff and find
> > > that the version number is 6.40.0.9 whereas the latest
> > version that Byron (I
> > > assume it was Byron anyway) compiled was 6.50.0.0. Is your
> > version based on
> > > older code or is there another reason for this?
> > There were so many misunderstandings and confusions about the version
> > numbers. I suggest rewriting the version number (in psqlodbc.h and
> > psqlodbc.rc) after each submitted patch for each submitter.
> > As I can see
> > in the CVS, last 6 months the source was modified by Peter,
> > Thomas, Tom
> > and Bruce. My idea is to change the version number to 7.0.3.1
> > or 7.1.0.0
> > if you experience that the driver works with 7.1devel.
> >
>
> Sounds sensible. I suspect that the non-Windows programmers might need
> reminding to update psqlodbc.rc though.
>
> Dave.
>

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026