| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: F_SETLK is looking worse and worse... |
| Date: | 2000-12-09 20:04:13 |
| Message-ID: | 200012092004.PAA24209@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> However, I have no objection to writing the value of DataDir into
> the socket lockfile (along with the owner's PID) if that seems like
> a worthwhile bit of info.
>
> Would there be any value in having a postmaster re-read its own socket
> lockfile every so often, to keep it looking active to /tmp sweepers?
> Or is that too much of a kluge?
Removing 10-day-old files from /tmp seems pretty broken to me, and I
hate to code around broken stuff.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | mlw | 2000-12-09 22:30:46 | Re: OK, does anyone have any better ideas? |
| Previous Message | Barry Jenner | 2000-12-09 17:31:27 | Re:Postgresql on dynix/ptx system |