Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: COPY BINARY is broken...

From: Alfred Perlstein <bright(at)wintelcom(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: COPY BINARY is broken...
Date: 2000-12-01 23:05:11
Message-ID: 20001201150509.L8051@fw.wintelcom.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
* Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> [001201 14:57] wrote:
> Alfred Perlstein <bright(at)wintelcom(dot)net> writes:
> > I would rip it out.
> 
> I thought about that too, but was afraid to suggest it ;-)

I think you'd agree that you have more fun and important things to
do than to deal with this yucky interface. :)

> How many people are actually using COPY BINARY?

I'm not using it. :)

How about adding COPY XML?











(kidding of course about the XML, but it would make postgresql more
buzzword compliant :) )

-- 
-Alfred Perlstein - [bright(at)wintelcom(dot)net|alfred(at)freebsd(dot)org]
"I have the heart of a child; I keep it in a jar on my desk."

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Don BaccusDate: 2000-12-01 23:47:58
Subject: Re: COPY BINARY is broken...
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2000-12-01 22:56:57
Subject: Re: COPY BINARY is broken...

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group