Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Indexing for geographic objects?

From: selkovjr(at)mcs(dot)anl(dot)gov
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "'pgsql-general '" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "'pgsql-hackers '" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Indexing for geographic objects?
Date: 2000-11-28 00:53:10
Message-ID: 200011280053.SAA16777@selkovjr.xnet.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-generalpgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:

> Do you have any problem with releasing your stuff under the Postgres
> distribution terms (BSD license)?

No, I don't see any problem with the BSD license, or any other
license, for that matter. I just had some reservations about releasing
stuff that was far from perfect, and it took me a while to realize
it could be useful as it is for some, and serve as a good starting
point for others. Now I wonder, what does it take to be in contrib?

> there's precedent, as regress already
> uses some contrib stuff.

I'd be curious to find out what that stuff is and how it's done. 

--Gene

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: John HuttleyDate: 2000-11-28 01:04:01
Subject: Please advise features in 7.1 (SUMMARY)
Previous:From: Mitch VincentDate: 2000-11-28 00:39:49
Subject: Re: 8192 BLCKSZ ?

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Warren VanichukDate: 2000-11-28 01:01:06
Subject: Division by zero.
Previous:From: Joe StumpDate: 2000-11-28 00:45:39
Subject: Re: [PHP] Re: [PHP-DB] Re: [SQL] a script that queries database periodically

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group