Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: CC not getting -O passed?

From: Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: CC not getting -O passed?
Date: 2000-10-30 16:55:10
Message-ID: 20001030105510.A3758@lerami.lerctr.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
* Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> [001030 10:53]:
> Larry Rosenman writes:
> 
> > BUT, we default C to -O, why not C++? 
> 
> Basically because we haven't done it yet.  I'm not sure whether we're
> going beta anytime soon, if not it'll probably get implemented.
My impression was REAL SOON NOW....
> 
> -- 
> Peter Eisentraut      peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net       http://yi.org/peter-e/

-- 
Larry Rosenman                      http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812 (voice) Internet: ler(at)lerctr(dot)org
US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2000-10-30 16:56:37
Subject: Re: WAL status update
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2000-10-30 16:55:01
Subject: Re: regression failure/UnixWare7.1.1/current sources

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group