Re: regression failure/UnixWare7.1.1/current sources

From: Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: regression failure/UnixWare7.1.1/current sources
Date: 2000-10-29 20:51:10
Message-ID: 20001029145110.A17811@lerami.lerctr.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

* Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> [001029 14:32]:
> Larry Rosenman writes:
>
> > Would the timezone change last night be causing this?
>
> The "timestamp" failure, yes. The "geometry", no. Geometry simply needs
> a new expected file, but unfortunately they're not the same for "cc" and
> "gcc"...
Hmm. I wonder why cc and gcc are doing different math. Wierd.

I suspect it might have to do with what gcc was compiled on (7.0.x of
UW). Can we make 2 expected files and have the map file figure it
out?

As to the timestamp, can we make a note that on timechange sundays
don't run the regression test? :-)

LER

>
> --
> Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://yi.org/peter-e/

--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812 (voice) Internet: ler(at)lerctr(dot)org
US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message The Hermit Hacker 2000-10-29 21:01:36 Re: another try
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2000-10-29 20:33:17 another try