Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: regression failure/UnixWare7.1.1/current sources

From: Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: regression failure/UnixWare7.1.1/current sources
Date: 2000-10-29 20:51:10
Message-ID: 20001029145110.A17811@lerami.lerctr.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
* Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> [001029 14:32]:
> Larry Rosenman writes:
> 
> > Would the timezone change last night be causing this? 
> 
> The "timestamp" failure, yes.  The "geometry", no.  Geometry simply needs
> a new expected file, but unfortunately they're not the same for "cc" and
> "gcc"...
Hmm. I wonder why cc and gcc are doing different math.  Wierd. 

I suspect it might have to do with what gcc was compiled on (7.0.x of
UW).   Can we make 2 expected files and have the map file figure it
out? 

As to the timestamp, can we make a note that on timechange sundays
don't run the regression test? :-) 

LER

> 
> -- 
> Peter Eisentraut      peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net       http://yi.org/peter-e/

-- 
Larry Rosenman                      http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812 (voice) Internet: ler(at)lerctr(dot)org
US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: The Hermit HackerDate: 2000-10-29 21:01:36
Subject: Re: another try
Previous:From: Marc G. FournierDate: 2000-10-29 20:33:17
Subject: another try

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group