* Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> [001027 21:53]:
> >>>> e) have a function network(inet) which would look up the address in a
> >>>> table of networks using longest-prefix-match. I.E. something similar to:
> >> No need. Let the user do it themselves. Similar to what we did for
> >> macaddr's back in the summer.
> > Yeah, it can be user-defined (or a contrib), no question about it, and for
> > people who have more than one table of networks, it will _have_ to be
> > user-defined.
> It seems clear to me that this mapping is best left to the user.
> A more interesting question is whether the system needs to provide any
> assisting functions that aren't there now. The lookup function you guys
> are postulating seems like it would be (in the simple cases)
> create function my_network(inet) returns cidr as
> 'select network from my_networks where ???'
> Maybe it's too late at night, but I'm having a hard time visualizing
> what the ??? condition is and whether any additional system-level
> functions are needed to make it simple/efficient.
I don't think we need this ASAP for 7.1. Let's get the basic stuff
working from a "least surprise" standpoint, and see what the user base
comes up with. I really think your proposal from earlier tonite is
the way to go, at least from my perspective.
> regards, tom lane
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812 (voice) Internet: ler(at)lerctr(dot)org
US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Alex Pilosov||Date: 2000-10-28 03:08:58|
|Subject: Re: Summary: what to do about INET/CIDR |
|Previous:||From: Larry Rosenman||Date: 2000-10-28 03:04:39|
|Subject: Re: Summary: what to do about INET/CIDR|