Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Small patch to replace 'idle' by 'trans' if transaction is still open

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Christof Petig <christof(dot)petig(at)wtal(dot)de>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Small patch to replace 'idle' by 'trans' if transaction is still open
Date: 2000-10-11 15:14:56
Message-ID: 200010111514.LAA09485@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
> Christof Petig <christof(dot)petig(at)wtal(dot)de> writes:
> > I would even propose 'idle (transaction open)' if you agree. (Seemed too
> > long for me)
> 
> No, the ps strings have got to be *short*.  A lot of platforms have a
> tight limit on how much command string ps will show.  I thought 'trans'
> was OK, though perhaps someone has an even better idea?

idle/trans?

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Philip WarnerDate: 2000-10-11 15:14:58
Subject: Re: Small patch to replace 'idle' by 'trans' if transaction is still open
Previous:From: Michael MeskesDate: 2000-10-11 15:04:37
Subject: Trigger question

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Philip WarnerDate: 2000-10-11 15:14:58
Subject: Re: Small patch to replace 'idle' by 'trans' if transaction is still open
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2000-10-11 14:54:17
Subject: Re: Small patch to replace 'idle' by 'trans' if transaction is still open

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group