| From: | Alfred Perlstein <bright(at)wintelcom(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "David J(dot) MacKenzie" <djm(at)web(dot)us(dot)uu(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Re: [PATCHES] PostgreSQL virtual hosting support |
| Date: | 2000-10-11 01:48:54 |
| Message-ID: | 20001010184854.C272@fw.wintelcom.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
* Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> [001010 18:36] wrote:
> I am tempted to apply this. This is the second person who asked for
> binding to a single port. The patch looks quite complete, with doc
> changes. It appears to be a thorough job.
>
> Any objections?
I know several other people were struggling with having multiple instances
of postgresql running on a box, especially keeping the unix domain pipe
hidden, this looks like a great thing to add.
-Alfred
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Adam Haberlach | 2000-10-11 02:06:47 | Re: Re: [HACKERS] My new job |
| Previous Message | Lamar Owen | 2000-10-11 01:46:44 | Re: Re: [PATCHES] PostgreSQL virtual hosting support |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Denis Perchine | 2000-10-11 04:27:43 | Re: Large objects in one table patch |
| Previous Message | Lamar Owen | 2000-10-11 01:46:44 | Re: Re: [PATCHES] PostgreSQL virtual hosting support |