Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: PostgreSQL and Cygwin 1.1.x

From: Jason Tishler <Jason(dot)Tishler(at)dothill(dot)com>
To: "'pgsql-ports(at)postgreSQL(dot)org'" <pgsql-ports(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Cygwin <cygwin(at)sources(dot)redhat(dot)com>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL and Cygwin 1.1.x
Date: 2000-09-29 13:25:34
Message-ID: 20000929092534.J1018@DP (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-ports
On Fri, Sep 29, 2000 at 03:03:42PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> OTOH, B20 is technically a beta release, and if dropping it would provide
> for significant simplifications, then the Cygwin user community could make
> that call.

IMO, I think that it is very reasonable to drop support for B20 because
Cygnus themselves do not really support B20 anymore.  I routinely see
responses from the core Cygwin team to posts on the list regarding B20
issues that encourage upgrading to the latest Cygwin Net Release.

Jason

-- 
Jason Tishler
Director, Software Engineering       Phone: +1 (732) 264-8770 x235
Dot Hill Systems Corporation         Fax:   +1 (732) 264-8798
82 Bethany Road, Suite 7             Email: Jason(dot)Tishler(at)dothill(dot)com
Hazlet, NJ 07730 USA                 WWW:   http://www.dothill.com

In response to

Responses

pgsql-ports by date

Next:From: Pete FormanDate: 2000-09-29 13:53:54
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL and Cygwin 1.1.x
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2000-09-29 13:03:42
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL and Cygwin 1.1.x

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group