Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: PostgreSQL and Cygwin 1.1.x

From: Jason Tishler <Jason(dot)Tishler(at)dothill(dot)com>
To: "'pgsql-ports(at)postgreSQL(dot)org'" <pgsql-ports(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Cygwin <cygwin(at)sources(dot)redhat(dot)com>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL and Cygwin 1.1.x
Date: 2000-09-29 13:25:34
Message-ID: 20000929092534.J1018@DP (view raw or whole thread)
Lists: pgsql-ports
On Fri, Sep 29, 2000 at 03:03:42PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> OTOH, B20 is technically a beta release, and if dropping it would provide
> for significant simplifications, then the Cygwin user community could make
> that call.

IMO, I think that it is very reasonable to drop support for B20 because
Cygnus themselves do not really support B20 anymore.  I routinely see
responses from the core Cygwin team to posts on the list regarding B20
issues that encourage upgrading to the latest Cygwin Net Release.


Jason Tishler
Director, Software Engineering       Phone: +1 (732) 264-8770 x235
Dot Hill Systems Corporation         Fax:   +1 (732) 264-8798
82 Bethany Road, Suite 7             Email: Jason(dot)Tishler(at)dothill(dot)com
Hazlet, NJ 07730 USA                 WWW:

In response to


pgsql-ports by date

Next:From: Pete FormanDate: 2000-09-29 13:53:54
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL and Cygwin 1.1.x
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2000-09-29 13:03:42
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL and Cygwin 1.1.x

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2015 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group