Re: loss of portability in ecpg

From: Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: loss of portability in ecpg
Date: 2000-09-21 17:12:02
Message-ID: 20000921101202.A1400@feivel.credativ.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Sep 20, 2000 at 11:20:05AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Current ecpg sources will not build on a compiler that doesn't accept
> "long long int". They are also overly optimistic about the prospects
> of having strtoull() in libc. I think some autoconf work is needed
> here.

Sorry about that. I intented to tell you about these changes since I do not
know autoconf enough to make the changes myself but real life
interfered after I committed them. And then I simply forgot about it. My
fault.

Please take my apologies.

Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Michael(at)Fam-Meskes(dot)De
Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire!
Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephan Szabo 2000-09-21 17:18:27 Re: Bug in RI
Previous Message Jeroen van Vianen 2000-09-21 15:41:10 Bug in RI