Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: loss of portability in ecpg

From: Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: loss of portability in ecpg
Date: 2000-09-21 17:12:02
Message-ID: 20000921101202.A1400@feivel.credativ.de (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Sep 20, 2000 at 11:20:05AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Current ecpg sources will not build on a compiler that doesn't accept
> "long long int".  They are also overly optimistic about the prospects
> of having strtoull() in libc.  I think some autoconf work is needed
> here.

Sorry about that. I intented to tell you about these changes since I do not
know autoconf enough to make the changes myself but real life
interfered after I committed them. And then I simply forgot about it. My
fault.

Please take my apologies.

Michael
-- 
Michael Meskes
Michael(at)Fam-Meskes(dot)De
Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire!
Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Stephan SzaboDate: 2000-09-21 17:18:27
Subject: Re: Bug in RI
Previous:From: Jeroen van VianenDate: 2000-09-21 15:41:10
Subject: Bug in RI

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group