| From: | Andrew Sullivan <sullivana(at)bpl(dot)on(dot)ca> |
|---|---|
| To: | user Postgresql ML <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: 7.1 Release Date |
| Date: | 2000-08-29 20:09:31 |
| Message-ID: | 20000829160931.A2286@bpl.on.ca |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Tue, Aug 29, 2000 at 03:33:48PM -0400, Lamar Owen wrote:
> This upgrading issue is already wearing thin at RedHat (or didn't
> you notice Trond's message) -- it would not surprise me in the
> least to see PostgreSQL dropped from the RedHat distribution in
> favor of InterBase or MySQL if this issue isn't fixed for 7.1.
Why don't they just do a test, and then echo an explanation of why
the old Postgres can't be updated? That's the way it works in
Debian, and I don't see anything wrong with it. I can't believe that
Red Hat figures it's package management is so good that it will
handle all cases, and then blame everyone else when the package
management breaks the packages.
A
--
Andrew Sullivan Computer Services
<sullivana(at)bpl(dot)on(dot)ca> Burlington Public Library
+1 905 639 3611 x158 2331 New Street
Burlington, Ontario, Canada L7R 1J4
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Trond Eivind =?iso-8859-1?q?Glomsr=F8d?= | 2000-08-29 20:13:07 | Re: 7.1 Release Date |
| Previous Message | Lamar Owen | 2000-08-29 19:53:19 | Re: 7.1 Release Date |